Scilex Holding Company Announces Acceptance of Abstract for Poster and Oral Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Pain Medicine (AAPM)
- Titled: Decreased Opioid Utilization with Lidocaine Topical System 1.8% Compared to Lidocaine 5% Patch: A Retrospective Claims Analysis (First author: Srinivas Nalamachu, M.D.). Oral Presentation Schedule: Saturday, March 9, 2024; 10:15-10:20AM (MST)
- In this retrospective analysis of OPTUM claims data, we evaluated over 6,000 patients with neuropathic pain who were treated with either ZTlido® or a generic lidocaine 5% patch and were also receiving an opioid.
- The study demonstrated a greater proportion of patients treated with ZTlido® (lidocaine topical system 1.8%) were able to either decrease or discontinue opioids (51.9% versus 45.5%, p=0.021) compared to patients treated with a generic lidocaine 5% patch. In addition, patients treated with ZTlido® had a more significant reduction in opioid dose relative to a generic lidocaine 5% patch.
- Regardless of the type of neuropathic pain, ZTlido® was associated with a greater opioid-sparing effect than a generic lidocaine 5% patch.
- While a generic lidocaine 5% patch has been well established to reduce analgesic use; this study is the first to evaluate the opioid-sparing effect of two bioequivalent formulations of lidocaine patches (ZTlido® and a generic lidocaine 5% patch).
- The novel design of ZTlido® has demonstrated significantly better adhesion performance than a generic lidocaine 5% patch. Greater adhesion provides improved medication delivery and pain relief for patients. As a result, improved adhesion for ZTlido® is likely contributing to more optimal pain management and enable reduction/discontinuation of opioid dose.
- In this retrospective analysis of OPTUM claims data, we evaluated over 6,000 patients with neuropathic pain who were treated with either ZTlido® or a generic lidocaine 5% patch and were also receiving an opioid.
- Title: Retrospective Claims Analysis of Decreased Healthcare Visits and Costs with Lidocaine Topical System 1.8% Compared to Lidocaine 5% Patch (First Author:
Srinivas Nalamachu , MD.) Oral Presentation Schedule:Saturday, March 9, 2024 ;10:20-10:25 AM (MST)
- In a retrospective analysis of over 889,000 patients, we used
Symphony Health claims data to evaluate the impact of ZTlido® (lidocaine topical system 1.8%) versus lidocaine 5% patch on healthcare resource utilization, including emergency room visits, office/clinic visits, outpatient visits, and pain procedures. - Across the studied care settings, treatment with ZTlido® was associated with either a reduction or insignificant increase in healthcare resource utilization, while lidocaine 5% patch was associated with consistently and significantly large increases in healthcare resource utilization.
- These results are consistent with and confirm early reported data from another retrospective claims analysis (Painweek 2023)
- This is the first study evaluating the impact on healthcare resource utilization of two bioequivalent formulations of lidocaine patch (ZTlido® and lidocaine 5% patch).
- The novel design of ZTlido® has demonstrated significantly better adhesion performance than lidocaine 5% patch. Greater adhesion provides improved medication delivery and pain relief for patients. As a result, improved adhesion for ZTlido® is likely contributing to more optimal pain management and may result in reduced healthcare resource utilization.
- In a retrospective analysis of over 889,000 patients, we used
For more information on ZTlido® including Full Prescribing Information, refer to www.ztlido.com.
For more information on ELYXYB®, including Full Prescribing Information, refer to www.elyxyb.com.
For more information on Gloperba®, including Full Prescribing Information, refer to www.gloperba.com.
About
In addition,
Forward-Looking Statements
This press release and any statements made for and during any presentation or meeting concerning the matters discussed in this press release contain forward-looking statements related to
Risks and uncertainties that could cause Scilex’s actual results to differ materially and adversely from those expressed in our forward-looking statements, include, but are not limited to: risks associated with the unpredictability of trading markets and whether a market will be established for Scilex’s common stock; general economic, political and business conditions; risks related to COVID-19 (and other similar disruptions); the risk that the potential product candidates that
Contacts:
Investors and Media
Office: (650) 516-4310
Email: investorrelations@scilexholding.com
Website: www.scilexholding.com
SEMDEXA™ (SP-102) is a trademark owned by
ZTlido® is a registered trademark owned by
Gloperba® is the subject of an exclusive, transferable license to use the registered trademark by
ELYXYB® is the subject of an exclusive, transferable license to use the registered trademark by
All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
© 2024 Scilex Holding Company All Rights Reserved.
Source: Scilex Holding Company